Archive for the 'Public benefit' Category

Law, regulation and governance – the outlook for charities in 2013

Third Sector asked me to make some predictions about what’s coming up, and what might sneak up and bite the charity sector from behind on the legal, regulatory and governance front in 2013.  Here’s what I said:

Next year the regulation of charities will polarise.  At one end, the Charity Commission’s activity will pretty much focus on fraud, serious abuse and counter-terrorism, as well as registering the new Charitable Incorporated Organisations.  The jury’s out on whether CIOs will catch on beyond an initial flurry of interest in early 2013 or if, longer term, they’ll prove to have limited appeal.  The charitable company model is familiar to both funders and lenders, so dual regulation is no longer the burden it once was;  it’s likely to remain the most popular and convenient structure. Public benefit cases, such as the Plymouth Brethren’s Tribunal appeal will continue to hound the Commission as well, masking the fact it’s a ‘non-issue’ for most charities.

At the other end of the spectrum, the vast majority of charities will simply submit their annual return to the Commission and  be left alone, providing they don’t get a ‘red mark’ for sending in late accounts.   Instead, there will be increasing emphasis on self or voluntary regulation with, for example, the Professional Standard Authority’s new accreditation scheme for health charities going live in 2013.

Expect also to see William Shawcross, the Commission’s new chair continuing to make strong statements about charities’ independence and to court controversy with those charities who regard themselves as ‘social businesses’.

The personalisation legislation which brings in direct payments to service users has huge implications and will lead to many financial gainers and losers.   Implementing the ‘Social Value’ legislation into commissioning will also bring opportunities and challenges, not least  the temptation for charities to go ‘off-mission’ in  pursuing some of these contracts.  Trustees will need the right skills to ensure that their charity properly understands and makes the most of these changes.  Some charities’ governance structures will clearly need to play catch up with the dramatic changes in the funding environment. For example trustee skills audits will need prioritising to ensure the board has the right financial and new business skills for the opportunities, risks and complexities.

One out of six charities say they may have to close next year so trustees will also need to be equipped to anticipate the options whether that’s collaboration, merger, or winding up.

Lastly, whisper it quietly, but I anticipate many charities continuing to approach the Charity Commission for permission to pay trustees.  The numbers of charities with these arrangements in place will grow, whatever is said at Ministerial level.

A version of Rosie’s blog first appeared in Third Sector on 8 January 2013

Breaking a promise – does the public benefit?

Since leaving the Charity Commission and NCVO respectively, and having been submerged by the public benefit debate over the past few years, it’s been a pleasant change not to have it at the forefront of our thinking. In fact, we’d made ourselves a promise not to mention it.

We know that, for most charities, demonstrating public benefit is just something they do and it’s pretty much second nature for them. The furore stoked up by the Independent Schools Council’s referral to the Tribunal has pretty much passed these charities by. They’ve simply been getting on with their day job.

But now the dust is beginning to settle on the public benefit judgement, and some wider issues are emerging. First, the judgement itself is bound to lead to further challenges. For all those commentators who have claimed it as a ‘victory’ for the independent schools, there will be lawyers offering pro-bono advice to the parents of school children at state schools to challenge whether their local prep or independent school is providing more than a ‘tokenistic’ public benefit to those unable to afford the fees. Expect the Commission to be kept busy on that front. Expect the person appointed to carry out the review of the 2006 Charities Act to be lobbied hard as well. Expect some headaches for politicians.

However, leaving that political hot potato aside, a broader notion of public benefit is becoming more common currency. For example, in recent days the Health Minister Earl Howe has said he is considering amending the NHS Bill to require Foundation Trusts to publish details of how their non-NHS earnings benefit NHS patients. (And NHS Foundation Trusts are already described as public benefit corporations.) ‘Public benefit’ also helped the university tuition fees legislation, with universities charging more than £6,000 now required to undertake measures to encourage students from poorer backgrounds to apply.

And, at a time when companies are polishing their social responsibility credentials and social enterprises are fashionable, charities should proclaim their public benefit more than ever. After all, public benefit is what makes charities special; it is why they deserve the support they get, from the public and the state. Tax relief to charities in the form of Gift Aid, rate relief, VAT and stamp duty relief was worth £2.56bn to the sector in 2010/11. There’s a lot of public benefit in that.

This post first appeared in Third Sector